- The Conveyor
- Posts
- Beyond China: "Non-Obvious" Sourcing Countries Worth Watching
Beyond China: "Non-Obvious" Sourcing Countries Worth Watching
Where a sourcing expert is expanding right now

Tariffs, geopolitics, port disruptions, factory fires - the last five years have made one thing clear: sourcing from a single country is a liability. The brands that handled 2025's tariff shock the best weren't necessarily the biggest or the best-funded. They were the ones that had been quietly building relationships with factories outside China before they needed them. Everyone else spent the year scrambling - paying air freight premiums, chasing capacity that was already spoken for, and making sourcing decisions under pressure that they'll be unwinding for the next two years.
Stephen Miller has spent his entire career in manufacturing and sourcing. He started on the operator side, managing inventory for a recycled apparel brand, then ran logistics for a national retailer with over 100 stores. Today he runs Sourcify, a platform that helps brands find and vet factories globally. He's personally worked with over 1,000 clients across the US, China, Vietnam, India, Mexico, and beyond. His team doubled its factory network this year from roughly 2,000 to 4,000 suppliers, with most of that growth outside China.

I asked him which “non-obvious” countries operators should be paying attention to right now.
Here’s what he told me:
1. Morocco
Best for: Textiles, apparel, soft goods
Stephen mentioned Morocco when I asked about overlooked sourcing alternatives. "Morocco has been very interesting," he said. "We have a free trade agreement with them. It's 15 days on the water to the East Coast. And the factories are doing fantastic."
The tariff picture
Morocco has had a free trade agreement with the U.S. since 2006 and is the only African country with one. Most qualifying goods entered duty-free until April 2025, when the 10% baseline reciprocal tariff applied broadly. Morocco got the same 10% rate as Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the UK. That reduced the FTA benefit but still puts Morocco well below most Asian origins, and far below neighboring countries like Algeria at 30% or Tunisia at 28%.
The transit advantage
For East Coast brands, ocean transit from Morocco runs 15 to 22 days depending on carrier and routing, compared to 30 to 40 from Southeast Asia and 45-plus from China. Shorter transit means less inventory on the water and more flexibility when policy shifts. That's a real operational advantage, not just a nice-to-have.
The port infrastructure supports it. Tanger Med, the largest port in Africa and the Mediterranean, handled over 10 million TEU in 2024 and connects to more than 180 ports across 70 countries. It sits on the main east-west maritime trade route, and carriers have been routing more transatlantic services through it.
What they make
Morocco's manufacturing base runs deeper than most operators expect. Automotive is the largest sector, with Renault and Stellantis operating major plants and over 200 Tier 1 and Tier 2 suppliers supporting them. Aerospace is significant too, with 140-plus manufacturers producing components that end up on Boeing and Airbus aircraft.
For ecommerce and retail brands, textiles and apparel is the relevant category.
The sector employs roughly 190,000 people across about 1,200 companies. What makes Morocco tactically useful for apparel is its sourcing flexibility. As Stephen explained: "They can pull a lot of raw material in, components from Europe and Africa and the Middle East and even China. And so it's a very interesting place and trade agreement where you can bring fabric in and transform it there and change the country of origin." Bring fabric into Morocco, manufacture the garment there, and it ships as Moroccan origin.
The honest barriers
Morocco isn't easy to access without relationships on the ground. "The best factories have the worst SEO," Stephen said. "You can't just look them up. You have to meet them in person or get referred to them." Sourcify has people on the ground there and has been running projects through those factories, which is the kind of access that actually matters.
You also need to show up prepared. Factories evaluate buyers as much as buyers evaluate them. Come without tech packs, forecasts, and clear specs and you'll get priced out. Stephen's team sees this constantly: "We can't approach a factory with this. They're going to laugh at us or they're going to price you out, as if you don't know what you're doing because it appears you don't know what you're doing."
Who it works for
Brands in textiles and soft goods that need faster East Coast transit and can work with a sourcing partner who has local relationships. Not a fit if you're chasing the lowest possible FOB cost or ordering small quantities.
2. Egypt
Best for: High-volume textiles and apparel
Stephen flagged Egypt when I asked about overlooked options in apparel and bedding. But his caveat was just as immediate: "It's hard to do business there without someone on the ground and without significant volume."
That tension is the story of Egypt for most brands. The cost advantage is real. The access barrier is also real.
The tariff picture
Egypt faces the same 10% baseline reciprocal tariff that landed in April 2025. The more complicated piece is the Qualifying Industrial Zone program. QIZ was established in 2004 and gave Egyptian manufacturers duty-free U.S. access, provided products included at least 10.5% Israeli content. The program was a meaningful advantage for Egypt's textile sector for two decades.
When reciprocal tariffs arrived, QIZ's status became murky.
Egyptian industry groups have been pushing to renegotiate the agreement and reduce the Israeli content threshold, partly because sourcing Israeli components has become logistically complex. The situation is still being worked out, but even with a 10% tariff applied broadly, Egypt retains a cost advantage for high-volume production that the QIZ framework still partially supports.
Why Egypt is competitive
Egypt employed roughly 1.5 million people across more than 8,000 textile and apparel companies and exported over $1 billion in that category to the U.S. in recent years. Its strength isn't variety. It's volume and cotton quality.
Egyptian long-staple cotton is measurably better than standard varieties. Fibers from the Nile Delta typically measure 33 to 36 millimeters, versus 25 to 30 millimeters for standard cotton. Longer fibers produce stronger, smoother yarn. This shows up in finished product quality in ways buyers can actually feel.
Chinese manufacturers have invested heavily in Egyptian industrial zones over the past decade, combining Egyptian cotton and labor with Chinese manufacturing process knowledge.
Egyptian minimum wages run roughly $200 per month versus $400 to $600 in China depending on region. For labor-intensive textile production at container-load volumes, that difference adds up fast.
The minimum order reality
Stephen: "We have a lot of people that want to leave China with they order 300 of something or a thousand of something. And that is the biggest factor."
The realistic minimum commitment for Egyptian factories willing to work with international brands is roughly $500,000 per program. Factories would rather have one large buyer than ten smaller ones, and their pricing makes that preference clear. If you can't hit the minimums, you'll either get quoted uncompetitively or not get a quote at all.
For mid-market brands with annual revenue spread across many SKUs with frequent turnover, this often doesn't work. Egyptian factories are built for long runs of stable products, not constant iteration.
Who it works for
Brands running high-volume, stable SKUs in textiles or apparel, with the purchase commitments to be taken seriously. If SKUs change frequently or orders are small, Egypt doesn't work.
3. Thailand
Best for: Precision electronics, automotive components
Thailand sits at 19% reciprocal tariff after negotiating its rate down from a proposed 36% in mid-2025. A framework agreement with the U.S. was announced in October 2025, with finalization still in progress.


Reply